Litigating an Atkins Claim: Rebutting the Prosecution’s Case After Moore v. Texas

Choose option(s) from grid below and click "Register".

Registration Options

Make your selection and click the Register button above.
TypeTitleStartEndCLEPrice
Litigating an Atkins Claim: Rebutting the Prosecution’s Case After Moore v. Texas - On-Demand Video
Online
---------- CLE 1 sub/0 eth PRICE Regular: $79.00
New Attorney: $40.00
Subscribers Pay: $0.00

About

Building on the United States Supreme Court's reliance on prevailing clinical standards for intellectual disability in Hall v. Florida, Moore v. Texas was a significant step forward for those litigating Atkins claims. This seminar will discuss the implications of Moore in dealing with arguments frequently raised by the prosecution or concerns articulated by courts during Atkins litigation. The session will conclude by using Commonwealth v. VanDivner as a case study examination of how the Pennsylvania Supreme Court just months ago applied Moore, Hall, and Atkins.

Recorded during the 2018 Criminal Law Symposium in June 2018.

Faculty

NameFirm/Company
Kirk James Henderson Esq. Federal Public Defender for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Faculty may vary by location.
PBI reserves the right to substitute speakers at all programs.
10113