competition

ATV Dealer Failed to Prove that Distributor’s Appointment of Competitor Will Lead to ‘Ruinous Competition’

A dealer of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) failed to prove that competition would be suppressed, not advanced, if a competitor was appointed to sell the same product line, the Commonwealth Court held in Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. v. State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons.

By | 2017-05-19T22:51:30+00:00 March 20th, 2015|Categories: Administrative Law|Tags: , , |Comments Off on ATV Dealer Failed to Prove that Distributor’s Appointment of Competitor Will Lead to ‘Ruinous Competition’