insurer

Supreme Court Clarifies Methodology for Reimbursing Providers of Medical Devices to Auto Accident Victims

Automobile insurers liable for reimbursing providers of medical products to accident victims are not restricted to the methodologies identified in the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) and Department of Insurance regulations, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held in Freedom Med. Supply, Inc. v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.

By | 2017-05-19T22:51:22+00:00 February 25th, 2016|Categories: General, Health Law, Insurance|Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |Comments Off on Supreme Court Clarifies Methodology for Reimbursing Providers of Medical Devices to Auto Accident Victims

Insured may Accept “Fair and Reasonable” Settlement without Insurer’s Consent

An insured did not forfeit its insurance coverage when it reasonably settled a lawsuit without the insurer’s consent, where the insurer had defended the suit subject to a reservation of rights, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held in Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear Insurers.

By | 2017-05-19T22:51:27+00:00 August 11th, 2015|Categories: Civil Litigation, Insurance|Tags: , , , , , , , , |Comments Off on Insured may Accept “Fair and Reasonable” Settlement without Insurer’s Consent