• On-Demand Video

Moore v. Harper and the Independent State Legislature Theory

Choose option(s) from grid below and click "Register".

Registration Options

Make your selection and click the Register button above.
TypeTitleStartEndCLEPrice
On-Demand Video

---------- CLE 1 sub/0 eth PRICE Regular: $79.00
New Attorney: $40.00
Subscribers Pay: $0.00

About

Moore v. Harper could have sweeping implications on upcoming federal elections.

The Supreme Court’s December 2022 argument session included one of the highest-profile cases of the 2022-23 term: Moore v. Harper. At the heart of the case is the idea known as the "Independent State Legislature Theory”, whose proponents argue that the U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures the sole authority to draw congressional maps and select Presidential electors, and that their decisions are unfettered by state constitutions and unreviewable by state courts. 

When it comes to making state laws that apply to federal elections — from drawing congressional district lines to voting procedures — under this theory, the state legislature has exclusive power to set the rules.

Proponents of the theory argue that the language of Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution grants state legislatures exclusive, and judicially unreviewable power to redraw congressional districts for federal elections, allowing partisan gerrymandering of congressional districts by state legislatures that is not reviewable by the state courts under their state constitutions. They also contend that Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution, which states that each State shall appoint Presidential electors “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct,” makes decisions on who has won a Presidential vote in the state for the purposes of the Electoral College also unreviewable by state courts, regardless of what’s written in the state’s constitution.

Join experts to explore the implications of the Independent State Legislature Theory, hear Pennsylvania specific perspectives, and learn what this means for the 2024 election. 

The discussion will touch upon these topics:

  • Judicial protections against gerrymandering
  • State courts’, governors’, and redistricting commissions’ veto rights
  • Potential changes to federal elections, including voter registration, mail-in voting, and voting hours
  • Moore v. Harper’s potential impact on redistricting and election law in other states

Co-sponsored with Keep Our Republic. Founded in 2020, Keep Our Republic is a non-partisan civic action organization dedicated to protecting a republic of laws and strengthening the checks and balances of our democratic electoral system.

All attendees will receive the course handout as a digital download. This handout is not available for purchase.

Recorded in April 2023.

Practice Areas

Faculty

NameFirm/Company
Hon. Thomas W. Corbett, Jr. Spilman Thomas & Battle (Pgh)
Justice Sandra Schultz Newman Newman ADR Mediation & Arbitration
Jonathan Winer Keep Our Republic
Faculty may vary by location.
PBI reserves the right to substitute speakers at all programs.
11842
©2024 Pennsylvania Bar Association. All rights reserved unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement. Unauthorized use, duplication, republication or redistribution of this material is strictly prohibited without the prior express written consent of the Pennsylvania Bar Association.